Minor Curiosities
I 
	tentatively offer for your delectation a few slightly more unusual Minor 
	methods for the Meeting at Hoole on Thursday 6th November. 
	They are not to be taken too seriously: 
	a bit of harmless fun, just for a change. 
	All should be within the capabilities of ringers who can ring, say, 
	
	1.  
	
	
	A principle
You might well say there is only one principle worth 
	ringing, and it is not for an even number of bells. 
	I would tend to agree.  
	The enduring popularity of Stedman reinforces that view. 
	Even other principles on odd numbers – 
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			1 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
| 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
			3 | 
| 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
| 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
| 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
| 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
| 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
	                                 
	
	Single
| 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
| 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
I’m 
	sure you can complete the plain course; but to save you puzzling it out 
	please refer to the other attachment to my e-mail. 
	Alternatively go to http://methods.ringing.org 
	and you can find it – and, indeed, any method – there.
	
	2.  
	
	
	An
	There are more treble hunts than just Plain or Treble Bob (or Treble Dodging 
	as we must call it now). I remember seeing a peal of Minor once in the 
	Ringing World which had 25 different treble hunts. 
	(No sinecure for the treble ringer there!) 
	Alliance Methods were once very popular with Minor bands who wanted 
	to increase the number of different methods in an extent. 
	The 1961 Collection of Minor Methods (‘the book’) has two 
	types of Alliance Methods.  This 
	one differs from Plain merely in the dodges in 5-6.
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			1 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
| 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
			3 | 
| 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
| 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
| 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
| 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
| 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
			1 | 
| 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
| 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			1 | 
| 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
| 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
| 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			3 | 
| 
			6 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
| 
			1 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			2 | 
| 
			1 | 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
	Essentially
	
	3.  
	
	
	A method – not a bob lead of another one – with 4ths at the end of the lead
Yes, 
	they do exist.  However, some of 
	the old methods that can be seen on peal boards are really bob leads of 
	other methods.  A good example is 
	Merchants’ Return:  the plain 
	lead is a bobbed lead of Woodbine. 
	Like Woodbine itself it was once a standard part of the Minor 
	repertoire.
The 
	method below, however, can be rung only with fourths place at the lead head. 
	You will notice that the work above the treble is a bob lead of 
	Anston TB
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
| 
			3 | 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
			4 | 
| 
			3 | 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
| 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
			4 | 
| 
			3 | 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
| 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			1 | 
| 
			3 | 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
| 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
			4 | 
			1 | 
| 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			1 | 
| 
			6 | 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
| 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
			1 | 
| 
			6 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
| 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
| 
			6 | 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
			4 | 
| 
			6 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
| 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
			4 | 
| 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
| 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
| 
			1 | 
			6 | 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
You 
	may know that 
	
	4.  
	
	
	A Slow Course method
	Nothing too curious so far, but now we are getting a bit weird. 
	The method is not really up to much, but this is it. 
	It will be seen that the 2 and 4 lead and make 2nds until the treble 
	comes back; the other bells then make 3rds and back. 
	The work above treble is Plain Bob. 
	It has conventional calls, and extents can easily be produced without 
	too many bobs, and with just two singles.  
	What makes it a Slow Course method is the fact that the 2nd, 
	in the plain course, does the same work for each lead.
	Maplin Slow 
	Course
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			1 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
| 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
			3 | 
| 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
| 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
| 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
			1 | 
| 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
			1 | 
			6 | 
| 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			3 | 
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
	
	5.  
	
	
	A twin-hunt method
If 
	the last method is just about tolerable and possibly worth ringing – once or 
	twice (perhaps even a 720) – for its curiosity value, then this one is much 
	more appropriate for the dustbin. 
	It was first rung in a peal earlier this year, but it is simply a 
	Doubles method transferred to Minor. 
	Grandsire Minor has been known for a long time – and was surprisingly 
	popular at one time.  This is 
	just a variation.  Perhaps it can 
	be rung once.  That’s enough. 
	Essentially rubbish.  (But 
	you might like it.)
	
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
			4 | 
			6 | 
| 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			3 | 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			1 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
| 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			1 | 
| 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
			2 | 
			1 | 
| 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
			1 | 
			2 | 
| 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			1 | 
			6 | 
			2 | 
| 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
			2 | 
			6 | 
| 
			4 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
	
	6.  
	
	
	A Little Surprise method
Now, 
	as you know, Little methods are not at all unknown. 
	We have all rung Little Bob, and most ringers will have rung Spliced 
	Plain and Little.  However, other 
	Little methods are far less common. At a more advanced level and on higher 
	numbers Little Surprise methods are rung quite frequently. 
	Littleport Little Surprise Royal is one example. 
	Little Surprise Minor on the other hand is somewhat esoteric. 
	To get an extent other hunt bells besides the treble need to be used, 
	and to call (and ring) a 720 would need a fair amount of concentration. 
	I actually thought of introducing variable hunt, but thought better 
	of it.  Something for Minor 
	Curiosities Part II.  Anyhow here 
	is one method which might be worth a go. 
	Endless dodging in 5-6 I’m afraid. (Horrendous when a bob is called.) 
	I suppose it is technically a Surprise method (although why not 
	Delight?).  It is sort of Little 
	Woodbine.  It is unnamed, and 
	perhaps we should leave it to its anonymity.  
	Dog-end S. Minor??
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			3 | 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			1 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			3 | 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			1 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
	
	7.  
	
	
	A common method reversed
In 
	the middle of the 19th century one 
	Navigation TB
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
| 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
| 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
| 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			1 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
| 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
| 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
| 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
			6 | 
| 
			5 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			1 | 
| 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			3 | 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			6 | 
| 
			5 | 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
			1 | 
| 
			5 | 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
| 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
| 
			5 | 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			3 | 
			1 | 
| 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
| 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			1 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
| 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
| 
			2 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			1 | 
			3 | 
			6 | 
| 
			4 | 
			2 | 
			1 | 
			5 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
| 
			4 | 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			5 | 
			3 | 
| 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
| 
			4 | 
			1 | 
			2 | 
			6 | 
			3 | 
			5 | 
| 
			1 | 
			4 | 
			6 | 
			2 | 
			5 | 
			3 | 
| 
			1 | 
			6 | 
			4 | 
			5 | 
			2 | 
			3 | 
But 
	it’s really Reverse Oxford TB.  
	You recognised that straightway, of course. 
	Still I reckon this one will be a bit tricky to ring; it is only here 
	because of the challenge of ringing it. 
	It is actually a regular method, but – for me – those 5-6 places away 
	from the treble condemn it.  I 
	really hate those.  I can easily 
	put up with irregular methods (like Morning Exercise, for instance), but 5ths 
	place apart from under the treble is very ugly, in my book anyhow. 
	After all there are 147 Treble Dodging methods and 30 Plain methods 
	in ‘the book’.  We don’t really 
	need to worry too much about the curiosities.
I 
	must acknowledge a handy little book by 
JDA
	
	
	Tuesday, 28 October 2008
	Return to Chester Branch website 
	
	www.cdg-chester-branch.org.uk
	
	I